merge functionality and examples in Readme

[yanchuk]

Motivation

Improve readme, make it more compact

Changes

• Merge Functionality and Examples sections into one

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Restructured README with a new consolidated "Supported functionality & Examples" section
  • Reorganized content into categorized subsections covering all API features
  • Added direct links to specific example files for simplified navigation
  • Improved overall layout and accessibility for users seeking documentation

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The README.md was restructured to consolidate usage examples and feature descriptions into a categorized "Supported functionality & Examples" section with improved navigation links to specific example files. No behavioral or code changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation restructuring README.md	Reorganized content from flat sectioned list into consolidated "Supported functionality & Examples" section with categorized subsections (Email API, Email Sandbox, Contacts API, Email Templates API, Suppressions API, General API) and direct links to example files.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

• Documentation-only changes with pure reorganization and no code logic modifications
• Navigation links added for clarity but no functional impact

Poem

🐰 A README made neat, organized with care,
Categories sorted beyond compare,
Links now direct to examples so fine,
Navigation improved, the docs now align! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description includes Motivation and Changes sections but is minimal, and lacks critical sections like 'How to test' and 'Images and GIFs' from the template.	Add 'How to test' section with verification steps and consider adding before/after comparison images if visual changes are significant.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: merging functionality and examples sections in the README for improved organization.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch readme-functionality-and-examples

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80f9ef7 and 37968ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📚 Learning: 2025-10-27T18:15:36.146Z

Learnt from: Ihor-Bilous
Repo: mailtrap/mailtrap-python PR: 55
File: examples/sending/batch_minimal_sending.py:13-21
Timestamp: 2025-10-27T18:15:36.146Z
Learning: In the mailtrap-python repository, example code in the examples/ directory does not require exhaustive error handling or defensive programming (e.g., handling all possible enum values with else branches). Example code should prioritize clarity and simplicity over production-level error handling.

Applied to files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)

• GitHub Check: Test python3.11 on windows-latest
• GitHub Check: Test python3.10 on windows-latest
• GitHub Check: Test python3.13 on windows-latest
• GitHub Check: Test python3.12 on windows-latest
• GitHub Check: Test python3.9 on windows-latest

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

217-252: All example file paths verified successfully.

The consolidated "Supported functionality & Examples" section references 22 example files across all API categories, and verification confirms all files exist in the repository. The documentation reorganization is complete, logically structured, and ready.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}