Skip to content

Increase default timeouts (without exponential scaling)#2674

Open
weebl2000 wants to merge 1 commit into
meshcore-dev:devfrom
weebl2000:be-more-patient-no-attempt-scaling
Open

Increase default timeouts (without exponential scaling)#2674
weebl2000 wants to merge 1 commit into
meshcore-dev:devfrom
weebl2000:be-more-patient-no-attempt-scaling

Conversation

@weebl2000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@weebl2000 weebl2000 commented Jun 3, 2026

Builds on #1691 but without exponential scaling. See discussion there:

image

@weebl2000 weebl2000 changed the title Increase default timeouts Increase default timeouts (without exponential scaling) Jun 3, 2026
@weebl2000 weebl2000 force-pushed the be-more-patient-no-attempt-scaling branch from 64fff25 to a81233e Compare June 5, 2026 15:25
@weebl2000 weebl2000 force-pushed the be-more-patient-no-attempt-scaling branch from a81233e to f3ce3c1 Compare June 6, 2026 19:57
weebl2000 added a commit to weebl2000/meshcore that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2026
… + minor

Changes vs dev_plus:
- meshcore-dev#1727 hardware-CAD redesign: cad_enabled pref (slot 293), 'cad on/off' CLI cmd,
  RSSI interference (int.thresh) + separate hardware-CAD gate in RadioLibWrappers.
  DEVIATION (per request): cad_enabled defaults to 1 (CAD ENABLED) on
  repeater/room/sensor; companion getCADEnabled() returns true.
  companion getInterferenceThreshold() aligned to PR (0; RSSI int.thresh disabled
  until currentRSSI() is fixed). Fixed a merge-dup of performChannelScan() decl.
- meshcore-dev#2001: 'af' getter ftoa -> ftoa3
- meshcore-dev#1896: ESP32 RTC fallback seed literal -> RTC_TIME_MIN
- meshcore-dev#1925: rak11200 P_LORA_DIO_1 via platformio build flag (not header #define)

No-ops (verified already-aligned in dev_plus, or intentionally absent):
meshcore-dev#1677 AEAD, meshcore-dev#1686 short-sleeps (=> meshcore-dev#1347 subset), meshcore-dev#2674 be-more-patient(+backoff),
meshcore-dev#1447 robust-contacts (absent), meshcore-dev#2537 fix-serial-bursts (absent).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant