Skip to content

[AutoPR- Security] Patch avahi for CVE-2025-68471, CVE-2025-68468, CVE-2025-68276 [MEDIUM]#15503

Closed
azurelinux-security wants to merge 5 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/avahi/2.0/1026066
Closed

[AutoPR- Security] Patch avahi for CVE-2025-68471, CVE-2025-68468, CVE-2025-68276 [MEDIUM]#15503
azurelinux-security wants to merge 5 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/avahi/2.0/1026066

Conversation

@azurelinux-security
Copy link
Contributor

@azurelinux-security azurelinux-security commented Jan 14, 2026

Auto Patch avahi for CVE-2025-68471, CVE-2025-68468, CVE-2025-68276.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1026066&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

  • Auto Patch avahi for CVE-2025-68471 (MEDIUM), CVE-2025-68468 (MEDIUM), CVE-2025-68276 (MEDIUM).
Change Log
  • CVE-2025-68471
  • CVE-2025-68468
  • CVE-2025-68276
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues
  • N/A
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

Correct the date for the changelog entry from 2024 to 2025.
Copy link
Contributor

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Patch Analysis (the patch applies cleanly)
fixed the changelog year.
autosetup -p1 ensures patch application

  • Buddy Build 
  • patch applied during the build (check rpm.log)
  • patch include an upstream reference
  • PR has security tag

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal added the ready-for-stable-review PR has passed initial review and is now ready for a second-level stable maintainer review label Jan 14, 2026
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 07:06
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2026 07:06
Copy link
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All the patches match with respective upstream references. Buddy build is successful. It seems that the %check section is empty for this package in 2.0 while 3.0 is having tests enabled. Please enable the test cases for 2.0 as well, using same commands, %make_build -k V=1 check || make check V=1 for better coverage of quality. Hopefully the tests will pass.

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Buddy Build

Copy link
Contributor

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

after adding check the Build passes.
LGTM

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal self-requested a review January 19, 2026 08:32
@archana25-ms
Copy link
Contributor

after adding check the Build passes. LGTM

Updated spec file and the test is successful

image

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Buddy Build

@archana25-ms
Copy link
Contributor

Buddy Build

Buddy build successful

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal removed AutoPR-Security ready-for-stable-review PR has passed initial review and is now ready for a second-level stable maintainer review labels Jan 27, 2026
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

closing in favour of #15581

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

main PR Destined for main Packaging security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments