Skip to content

Follow-up advanced-support fixes#6175

Closed
dino475 wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
dean/remove-quarterly-reviews
Closed

Follow-up advanced-support fixes#6175
dino475 wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
dean/remove-quarterly-reviews

Conversation

@dino475

@dino475 dino475 commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Follow-up fixes to the advanced-support page after #6172 merged:

  • Replace em dashes with parentheses throughout
  • Remove "Pro plan" references (no longer offered)
  • Stack tier cards vertically (cols=1)
  • Swap Tier 1 icon to laptop
  • Add href anchors to cards linking to their detail sections
  • Update comparison table: "AI routing from Slack" and "CSM escalates from Slack"

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Single MDX documentation page with no application, auth, or data-handling changes.

Overview
Follow-up edits to advanced-support.mdx after the tiered support restructure: clearer navigation, plan wording, and softer SLA language.

Adds a comparison table and vertically stacked tier cards (cols={1}) with anchor links to each tier section; Tier 1 uses the laptop icon. Table copy now distinguishes “AI routing from Slack” vs “CSM escalates from Slack.”

Pro plan references are removed (Standard is framed as Enterprise-included / all plans where noted). SLA wording is consistently “response time targets”; Tier 3 drops quarterly business reviews from bullets and FAQs. Style tweaks: em dashes → parentheses in several sentences; keywords drop “SLA”; FAQ section “SLAs and coverage hours” is renamed “Coverage hours.”

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9dd4602. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

dino475 and others added 13 commits June 14, 2026 12:18
Quarterly reviews are not currently offered. Removes all three
references across the tier description and FAQ accordions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@dino475 dino475 closed this Jun 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants