Skip to content

Blog: Evolving the Node.js Release Schedule#8631

Open
UlisesGascon wants to merge 24 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
UlisesGascon:release-announcement
Open

Blog: Evolving the Node.js Release Schedule#8631
UlisesGascon wants to merge 24 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
UlisesGascon:release-announcement

Conversation

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon commented Feb 15, 2026

Preview url: https://nodejs-org-git-fork-ulisesgascon-release-announcement-openjs.vercel.app/en/blog/announcements/evolving-the-nodejs-release-schedule

PUBLICATION DATE: April 2nd

Objective

This is an initial draft of the blog post, intended to collect feedback and iterate until we have a clear plan for communicating the release schedule change.

Explain to the users that we are planning a change in the Release Schedule starting on Node@27 and provide context on how the schedule works in general lines and the motivation for this change.

Context

We have been discussing this topic for a while in nodejs/Release#1113, nodejs/Release#953 and at the Collaboration Summit Chesapeake 2025.

The goal of this post is to communicate the change clearly to users as part of the messaging around Node 26.x, since the new plan will take effect starting with Node 27.x. We decided to write this blog post during our last Release WG meeting.

- Add "About the Alpha Channel" section explaining:
  - Target audience (library authors, CI pipelines)
  - Expectations (no security patches, API may change)
  - Rationale (feedback loop + V8 updates)
  - ABI stability noted as TBD
- Simplify schedule phases: Alpha → Current → LTS (29 months)
- Remove Active LTS / Maintenance distinction
- Add Ubuntu release cycle comparison for familiarity
- Clean up v26/v27 timelines (remove Maintenance milestone)
 - Add comprehensive 10-year schedule table (v27-v36) with Alpha, Release, LTS, and End of Life dates
 - Clarify that Alpha channel uses only nightly builds (no formal alpha releases, reducing releaser workload)
 - Link to nodejs.org/download/nightly for early testing
 - Reorder Timeline section: v26 → v27 → 10-year table
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 15, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org Error Error Mar 1, 2026 11:42am

Request Review

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Codeowner Review Request

The following codeowners have been identified for the changed files:

Team reviewers: @nodejs/releasers @nodejs/nodejs-website

Please review the changes when you have a chance. Thank you! 🙏

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.07%. Comparing base (f11d90f) to head (2661a1d).
⚠️ Report is 26 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8631      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.01%   75.07%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         103      104       +1     
  Lines        9068     9166      +98     
  Branches      315      316       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         6802     6881      +79     
- Misses       2264     2283      +19     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
---
date: '2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just a placeholder, no idea when makes sense to publish it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's align it with Kylie and Robin. We should create an official tweet using Node.js account along with it.

Copy link
Member

@gurgunday gurgunday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite those changes, I think we need to mention that it's up to the release team to define what the rules will be to ship semver-major commits in alpha versions.

Tried to implement some of the feedback

Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike McCready <66998419+MikeMcC399@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
- **One major release per year** (April), with LTS promotion in October
- **Every release becomes LTS**. No more odd/even distinction.
- **Alpha channel replaces odd-numbered releases** for early testing (for librairies)
- **Version numbers align with years**: 27.0.0 in 2027, 28.0.0 in 2028
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a nice coincidence, but not sure this is worth stating here; it's not a stated objective or an explicit commitment of the new release plan.

Co-authored-by: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com>
UlisesGascon and others added 2 commits February 24, 2026 18:29
Co-authored-by: Matt Cowley <me@mattcowley.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2026 20:02
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2026 20:02
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 26, 2026 20:02
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2026 20:02
@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member Author

Updated publication date to April 2nd

This comment was marked as resolved.

@richardlau richardlau added the release-agenda Agenda items for the next Release Working Group meeting. label Feb 27, 2026
- Fix Alpha duration from 5 to 6 months (Oct-Mar)
- Correct LTS duration from 29 to 30 months
- Update total support from 35 to 36 months
- Update all EOL dates from March to April
- Add alpha versioning format example (27.0.0-alpha.1)
- Clarify version number alignment wording
- Clarify "from first Current release" for total support
- Fix grammar: "to not be" → "not to be"
- Fix grammar: "may be not included" → "may not be included"
- Improve readability by breaking long lines

Co-authored-by: Richard Lau <5445507+richardlau@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nick Schonning <1297909+nschonni@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-agenda Agenda items for the next Release Working Group meeting.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.