Skip to content

NO-ISSUE: channels/stable-4.1[6-8]: 4.16 is into it's EUS phase#8709

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
wking:4.16-end-of-maintenance
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

NO-ISSUE: channels/stable-4.1[6-8]: 4.16 is into it's EUS phase#8709
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
wking:4.16-end-of-maintenance

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@wking wking commented Jan 31, 2026

Generated with:

$ hack/release-end-of-maintenance.sh 4.16

to catch up with the earlier 2025-12-27 transition:

$ curl -s 'https://access.redhat.com/product-life-cycles/api/v1/products?name=OpenShift+Container+Platform' | jq -c '.data[].versions[] | select(.name == "4.16").phases[]'
{"name":"General availability","date":"2024-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Full support","date":"2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Maintenance support","date":"2025-12-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support","date":"2026-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support Term 2","date":"2027-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support Term 3","date":"N/A","date_format":"string","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended life phase","date":"N/A","date_format":"string"}

The delay here was waiting for openshift/installer@be845abbc0 (openshift/installer#10226) to make it into a 4.16.z, and it's in 4.16.56. While the older, stable-4.16 default 4.16.55 has almost made it through to all the stable changel it was aiming for:

$ git grep 4.16.55 channels
channels/candidate-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/candidate-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/candidate-4.18.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/eus-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/fast-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/fast-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/stable-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/stable-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55

It still needs a new 4.18.z to be built before it gets into stable-4.18. There isn't even one in candidate-4.18 yet:

$ hack/show-edges.py --cincinnati https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/graph --root-version 4.16.55 candidate-4.18
4.16.55 -> 4.16.56
4.16.55 -> 4.17.47

But we can't wait for that new 4.18.z to cook all the way through to stable-4.18, because the eus-4.16 default 4.16.56 would have cooked into stable-* by then. So land this transition now, and we'll come back around later and manually add 4.16.55 to stable-4.18 later.

Generated with:

  $ hack/release-end-of-maintenance.sh 4.16

to catch up with the earlier 2025-12-27 transition:

  $ curl -s 'https://access.redhat.com/product-life-cycles/api/v1/products?name=OpenShift+Container+Platform' | jq -c '.data[].versions[] | select(.name == "4.16").phases[]'
  {"name":"General availability","date":"2024-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Full support","date":"2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Maintenance support","date":"2025-12-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support","date":"2026-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support Term 2","date":"2027-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support Term 3","date":"N/A","date_format":"string","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended life phase","date":"N/A","date_format":"string"}

The delay here was waiting for openshift/installer@be845abbc0
(data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.16,
2026-01-15, openshift/installer#10226) to make it into a 4.16.z, and
it's in 4.16.56 [1].  While the older, stable-4.16 default 4.16.55 has
almost made it through to all the stable changel it was aiming for:

  $ git grep 4.16.55 channels
  channels/candidate-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/candidate-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/candidate-4.18.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/eus-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/fast-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/fast-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/stable-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
  channels/stable-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55

It still needs a new 4.18.z to be built before it gets into
stable-4.18.  There isn't even one in candidate-4.18 yet:

  $ hack/show-edges.py --cincinnati https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/graph --root-version 4.16.55 candidate-4.18
  4.16.55 -> 4.16.56
  4.16.55 -> 4.17.47

But we can't wait for that new 4.18.z to cook all the way through to
stable-4.18, because the eus-4.16 default 4.16.56 would have cooked
into stable-* by then.  So land this transition now, and we'll come
back around later and manually add 4.16.55 to stable-4.18 later.

[1]: https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.16.56
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wking: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Generated with:

$ hack/release-end-of-maintenance.sh 4.16

to catch up with the earlier 2025-12-27 transition:

$ curl -s 'https://access.redhat.com/product-life-cycles/api/v1/products?name=OpenShift+Container+Platform' | jq -c '.data[].versions[] | select(.name == "4.16").phases[]'
{"name":"General availability","date":"2024-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Full support","date":"2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Maintenance support","date":"2025-12-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support","date":"2026-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support Term 2","date":"2027-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended update support Term 3","date":"N/A","date_format":"string","additional_text":""}
{"name":"Extended life phase","date":"N/A","date_format":"string"}

The delay here was waiting for openshift/installer@be845abbc0 (openshift/installer#10226) to make it into a 4.16.z, and it's in 4.16.56. While the older, stable-4.16 default 4.16.55 has almost made it through to all the stable changel it was aiming for:

$ git grep 4.16.55 channels
channels/candidate-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/candidate-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/candidate-4.18.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/eus-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/fast-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/fast-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/stable-4.16.yaml:- 4.16.55
channels/stable-4.17.yaml:- 4.16.55

It still needs a new 4.18.z to be built before it gets into stable-4.18. There isn't even one in candidate-4.18 yet:

$ hack/show-edges.py --cincinnati https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/graph --root-version 4.16.55 candidate-4.18
4.16.55 -> 4.16.56
4.16.55 -> 4.17.47

But we can't wait for that new 4.18.z to cook all the way through to stable-4.18, because the eus-4.16 default 4.16.56 would have cooked into stable-* by then. So land this transition now, and we'll come back around later and manually add 4.16.55 to stable-4.18 later.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jan 31, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from DavidHurta and fao89 January 31, 2026 00:42
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 31, 2026

@wking: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DavidHurta DavidHurta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold

Thanks for the detailed description! 🙇

Changes look good. Holding due to my sole comment.

Comment thread channels/stable-4.18.yaml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
feeder:
delay: PT0H
filter: 4[.](16|17|18)[.][0-9].*
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So land this transition now, and we'll come back around later and manually add 4.16.55 to stable-4.18 later.

Do we have a Jira to track this? If not, I am happy to create one. To make sure that the version is added.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No Jira yet, I just set myself a reminder to start checking again in a few weeks, after which I'll poll weekly. I have no problem with you creating a Jira if you like.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have created https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-1852. I have assigned it to me so that I can practice a bit on these graph-data thingies, if that works for everyone.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can also assign it to anyone else.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 2, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidHurta, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 0daef27 into openshift:master Feb 2, 2026
3 checks passed
@wking wking deleted the 4.16-end-of-maintenance branch February 2, 2026 20:42
wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
As described in 16cb1cb (channels/stable-4.1[6-8]: 4.16 is into
it's EUS phase, 2026-01-27, openshift#8709), we had to drop the 'feeder' for
4.16.z to keep the EUS-phase 4.16.56 out of stable-* before 4.16.55
had quite percolated through to all its appropriate stable-* channels.
This commit manually finishes off 4.16.55, now that there's a newer
stable 4.18.z release to update to (and there has been for a month,
since 4.18.32 was itself manually promoted to stale-4.18):

  $ git blame --first-parent channels/stable-4.18.yaml | tail -n2
  023497c (Scott Dodson             2026-02-03 10:27:27 -0500 140) - 4.18.32
  c105cbe (openshift-merge-bot[bot] 2026-02-18 07:33:44 +0000 141) - 4.18.33
  $ hack/show-edges.py --cincinnati https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/graph --root-version 4.16.55 candidate-4.18 | grep ' 4[.]18[.]' | sort -V | head -n1
  4.17.47 -> 4.18.32
wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
As described in 16cb1cb (channels/stable-4.1[6-8]: 4.16 is into
it's EUS phase, 2026-01-27, openshift#8709), we had to drop the 'feeder' for
4.16.z to keep the EUS-phase 4.16.56 out of stable-* before 4.16.55
had quite percolated through to all its appropriate stable-* channels.
This commit manually finishes off 4.16.55, now that there's a newer
stable 4.18.z release to update to (and there has been for a month,
since 4.18.32 was itself manually promoted to stable-4.18):

  $ git blame --first-parent channels/stable-4.18.yaml | tail -n2
  023497c (Scott Dodson             2026-02-03 10:27:27 -0500 140) - 4.18.32
  c105cbe (openshift-merge-bot[bot] 2026-02-18 07:33:44 +0000 141) - 4.18.33
  $ hack/show-edges.py --cincinnati https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/graph --root-version 4.16.55 candidate-4.18 | grep ' 4[.]18[.]' | sort -V | head -n1
  4.17.47 -> 4.18.32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants