Skip to content

WIP: E2E: Add E2E test for mcp label changes#1446

Draft
mrniranjan wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
mrniranjan:mcp_predicate
Draft

WIP: E2E: Add E2E test for mcp label changes#1446
mrniranjan wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
mrniranjan:mcp_predicate

Conversation

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

@mrniranjan mrniranjan commented Dec 12, 2025

Add E2E test case to verify Performance profile controller reconciles when there are changes in mcp label changes

@mrniranjan
E2E: Add E2E test for mcp label changes
1083bce 
Add E2E test case to verify Performance profile
controller reconciles when there are changes
in mcp label changes

Signed-off-by: Niranjan M.R <mniranja@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 12, 2025
@mrniranjan mrniranjan marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2025 11:19
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from MarSik and ffromani December 12, 2025 11:19
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mrniranjan
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ffromani for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 13, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-merge-robot commented Mar 13, 2026

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ffromani ffromani Awaiting requested review from ffromani

@MarSik MarSik Awaiting requested review from MarSik

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mrniranjan @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot