Skip to content

NE-2292: Add origin test for the NO-OLM testing#30883

Draft
rhamini3 wants to merge 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
rhamini3:ne-2292
Draft

NE-2292: Add origin test for the NO-OLM testing#30883
rhamini3 wants to merge 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
rhamini3:ne-2292

Conversation

@rhamini3
Copy link
Contributor

Adding origin testing for CIO provisioning without OLM resources

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 14, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 14, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Excluded labels (none allowed) (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 855321bb-68fa-4cfc-b446-3d2a9de5b4c0

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Tip

CodeRabbit can approve the review once all CodeRabbit's comments are resolved.

Enable the reviews.request_changes_workflow setting to automatically approve the review once all CodeRabbit's comments are resolved.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rhamini3: An error was encountered searching for bug NE-2292 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. No response returned: Get "https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/NE-2292": GET https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/NE-2292 giving up after 5 attempt(s)

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Adding origin testing for CIO provisioning without OLM resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Mar 14, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhamini3
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sosiouxme for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhamini3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-virt-techpreview
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview

@rhamini3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-virt-techpreview
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview

1 similar comment
@rhamini3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-virt-techpreview
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Mar 15, 2026

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 31d592e

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (18) are below the historical average (1414): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (18) are below the historical average (1441): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

// deleted, and so we have an explicit delete command here just
// in case. The --ignore-not-found option should prevent errors
// if garbage collection has already deleted the object.
o.Expect(oc.AsAdmin().WithoutNamespace().Run("delete").Args("--ignore-not-found=true", "istio", istioName).Execute()).Should(o.Succeed())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is something you will need to fix, this g.AfterEach(func() { is specific to OSSM, and needs to be adjusted to not do OSSM-specific tasks (and possibly some Sail Library-specific cleanup).

@rhamini3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2026

@rhamini3: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview 31d592e link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview 31d592e link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants