Generic numeric debugging#19317
Conversation
Differential Revision: D103956056
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/19317
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 4 New Failures, 2 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 4ef4ff5 with merge base 0f9de6a ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
@metascroy has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D103956056. |
This PR needs a
|
|
@metascroy has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D103956056. |
| specs: list[TapSpec] = [] | ||
| new_tap_nodes: list[fx.Node] = [] | ||
|
|
||
| for node in candidate_nodes: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what happens if the delegate have to fuse some candidate nodes? Try lowering conv2d-->batch_norm, where XNNPACK doesn't support standalone batch_norm IIRC.
Also how is it better than forced-single-op-partitions?
Differential Revision: D103956056