Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes#811

Open
resyntax-ci[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
masterfrom
autofix-147-1
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes#811
resyntax-ci[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
masterfrom
autofix-147-1

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci Bot commented May 24, 2026

Resyntax fixed 12 issues in 10 files.

  • Fixed 3 occurrences of printf-to-display
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of hash-set!-ref-to-hash-update!
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of let-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of named-let-loop-to-for-in-range
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of delete-redundant-let
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of and-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-cond-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of quasiquote-to-list
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define

resyntax-ci Bot added 10 commits May 24, 2026 01:20
This `let` binding does nothing and can be removed.
This named `let` expression is equivalent to a `for` loop that uses `in-range`.
This use of `printf` has no arguments other than the template string.
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-update!` expression.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This quasiquotation is equialent to a simple `list` call.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
Using `cond` allows converting `let` to internal definitions, reducing nesting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants