User Feedback on Guest + S3StorageClient #79
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adamjohnwright
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2025
GFJHogue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
User Feedback on Guest + S3StorageClient
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR enables User Feedback 👍👎 on the Guest instance by enabling Chainlit's data layer.
Feedback comments are safely inserted into the DB as recommended by SQLAlchemy/Psycopg for string sanitation.
Seems to work fine with both instances using the same Chainlit DB.
Also added the option to enable the S3StorageClient for Chainlit Elements persistence.
In our current app, this would enable persisted search results.
To enable this, define
S3_BUCKETandS3_CHAINLIT_PREFIXin.env.