Update links in compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/README.md for type checking

[reddevilmidzy]

cc: rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2662

[rustbot]

r? @nnethercote

rustbot has assigned @nnethercote.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[Kivooeo]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit d81ff85 has been approved by Kivooeo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit d81ff85 with merge 8da80d3...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kivooeo
Pushing 8da80d3 to main...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 2e854a9 (parent) -> 8da80d3 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 8da80d36a3b8fe4c0cc737b1e9494ce33a091f01 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. dist-aarch64-apple: 7591.9s -> 6421.4s (-15.4%)
2. dist-x86_64-apple: 7556.9s -> 6418.6s (-15.1%)
3. dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw: 5742.1s -> 6393.0s (+11.3%)
4. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 4410.4s -> 3959.7s (-10.2%)
5. dist-apple-various: 4211.9s -> 3796.5s (-9.9%)
6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-2: 4960.6s -> 5434.3s (+9.5%)
7. arm-android: 5821.1s -> 5366.3s (-7.8%)
8. aarch64-msvc-2: 5892.0s -> 6304.1s (+7.0%)
9. aarch64-gnu: 7829.8s -> 7285.6s (-7.0%)
10. aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3514.4s -> 3270.7s (-6.9%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (8da80d3): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 5.6%, secondary 3.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	5.6%	[5.6%, 5.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.4%	[2.3%, 5.6%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.9%	[-2.1%, -1.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	5.6%	[5.6%, 5.6%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.0%	[2.0%, 2.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.9%	[-6.2%, -2.9%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 482.393s -> 483.256s (0.18%)
Artifact size: 390.46 MiB -> 392.46 MiB (0.51%)