Skip to content

Stabilize feature isolate_most_least_significant_one#155130

Open
okaneco wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
okaneco:stabilize_iso_high_one
Open

Stabilize feature isolate_most_least_significant_one#155130
okaneco wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
okaneco:stabilize_iso_high_one

Conversation

@okaneco
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@okaneco okaneco commented Apr 10, 2026

FCP completed #136909 (comment)

Closes #136909

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 10, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 10, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: @scottmcm, libs
  • @scottmcm, libs expanded to 8 candidates
  • Random selection from Mark-Simulacrum, scottmcm

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@okaneco okaneco force-pushed the stabilize_iso_high_one branch from b378309 to a69f989 Compare April 10, 2026 21:59
@tgross35
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval, the const stabilization here is trivial but I think we usually ping you anyways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for isolate_most_least_significant_one

5 participants