Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#51

Open
saurabharch wants to merge 1 commit intovee-eight-lkgrfrom
snyk-fix-ba23005eb97060a91b04c1223607e464
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#51
saurabharch wants to merge 1 commit intovee-eight-lkgrfrom
snyk-fix-ba23005eb97060a91b04c1223607e464

Conversation

@saurabharch
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • deps/npm/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Directory Traversal
SNYK-JS-TAR-15032660
  693  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Directory Traversal

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @saurabharch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides an automated security fix initiated by Snyk to resolve a significant "Directory Traversal" vulnerability within the project's npm dependencies. The changes involve updating specific package versions to their latest secure releases, thereby enhancing the overall security posture of the application by mitigating a known exploit.

Highlights

  • Security Vulnerability Fix: This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a critical "Directory Traversal" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-TAR-15032660) found in the project's npm dependencies.
  • Dependency Upgrades: To remediate the identified vulnerability, the 'tar' package has been upgraded from version '^4.0.2' to '^7.5.7'. Additionally, the 'pacote' package has been updated from '^7.0.2' to '^21.0.1'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a 'Directory Traversal' vulnerability by upgrading the pacote and tar dependencies. The tar package is upgraded from ^4.0.2 to ^7.5.7, and pacote is upgraded from ^7.0.2 to ^21.0.1. Both of these are major version upgrades that carry a risk of introducing breaking changes, which I've highlighted in my comments. It is crucial to perform thorough regression testing, especially around package installation, packing, and extraction functionalities, before merging this change.

"opener": "~1.4.3",
"osenv": "~0.1.4",
"pacote": "^7.0.2",
"pacote": "^21.0.1",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This is a major version upgrade for pacote (from v7 to v21). This is a significant jump and is likely to include breaking changes. It is highly recommended to perform thorough testing on functionality that relies on pacote (like package extraction) to prevent regressions.

"ssri": "~5.0.0",
"strip-ansi": "~4.0.0",
"tar": "^4.0.2",
"tar": "^7.5.7",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This upgrade to tar from v4 to v7 is a major version bump. While it fixes a security vulnerability, it may also introduce breaking changes. Given that tar is used for packing and unpacking packages, it's critical to test these code paths for any regressions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants