Skip to content

Conversation

@dvasilas
Copy link
Contributor

The contentLength field in S3 analytics captures egress (response size) for GetObject operations and ingress (request size) for PutObject.

In server access logs, contentLength was the HTTP request body size (bytes received from client).
This broke backwards compatibility with S3 analytics, and caused an Integration test to fail.


The fix is to update contentLength to capture transfer size (egress for GET, ingress for PUT).

This PR includes a second fix for objectSize to always reflect full object size (and not sizes in range get operations).


Intregration bulid with this fix: https://github.com/scality/Integration/actions/runs/21141099093

Fix contentLength to capture actual transfer size (egress for GET,
ingress for PUT) instead of always using request body size.
This restores backwards compatibility with S3 analytics.

Fix objectSize to always reflect full object size by passing metadata
from objectGet, preventing partial sizes in range get.
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 19, 2026

Hello dvasilas,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 19, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-827 contains:

  • 9.2.15

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.2.16

  • 9.3.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-827, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@dvasilas
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 19, 2026

Conflict

A conflict has been raised during the creation of
integration branch w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-827 with contents from bugfix/CLDSRV-827
and development/9.3.

I have not created the integration branch.

Here are the steps to resolve this conflict:

 git fetch
 git checkout -B w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-827 origin/development/9.3
 git merge origin/bugfix/CLDSRV-827
 # <intense conflict resolution>
 git commit
 git push -u origin w/9.3/bugfix/CLDSRV-827

The following options are set: approve

@dvasilas
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 19, 2026

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.2

  • ✔️ development/9.3

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 19, 2026

Queue build failed

The corresponding build for the queue failed:

  • Checkout the status page.
  • Identify the failing build and review the logs.
  • If no issue is found, re-run the build.
  • If an issue is identified, checkout the steps below to remove
    the pull request from the queue for further analysis and maybe rebase/merge.
Remove the pull request from the queue
  • Add a /wait comment on this pull request.
  • Click on login on the status page.
  • Go into the manage page.
  • Find the option called Rebuild the queue and click on it.
    Bert-E will loop again on all pull requests to put the valid ones
    in the queue again, while skipping the one with the /wait comment.
  • Wait for the new queue to merge, then merge/rebase your pull request
    with the latest changes to then work on a proper fix.
  • Once the issue is fixed, delete the /wait comment and
    follow the usual process to merge the pull request.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 20, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.2

  • ✔️ development/9.3

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-827.

Goodbye dvasilas.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 4237aad into development/9.2 Jan 20, 2026
29 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/CLDSRV-827 branch January 20, 2026 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants