Skip to content

Completed Design 1 course#2669

Open
sanjoli97 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sanjoli97:master
Open

Completed Design 1 course#2669
sanjoli97 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sanjoli97:master

Conversation

@sanjoli97
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Implement Hash Set (MyHashSet.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean, well-documented code with clear comments explaining the double hashing approach
  • Correct handling of the special case for bucket 0 (needs bucketItem + 1 size)
  • Proper null checks before accessing secondary arrays in remove() and contains()
  • Good variable naming that makes the code readable
  • Time complexity matches the reference solution at O(1) for all operations

Areas for Improvement:

  • The comment mentions "push, pop, peek, getMin" which are stack operations, not relevant to a HashSet. This should be corrected to reflect the actual methods (add, remove, contains).
  • Could consider making bucket and bucketItem constants (final) since they don't change after initialization.
  • The solution is functionally equivalent to the reference but could benefit from more explicit documentation about why the special case for bucket 0 exists.

VERDICT: PASS


Implement Min Stack (MinStack.java)

Strengths:

  • The single-stack approach is more space-efficient than the two-stack reference solution (only one Stack object vs two)
  • Excellent documentation with comments explaining the algorithm
  • Clean and readable code structure
  • Correctly handles edge cases (val <= min handles equal values properly)

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution is functionally correct and efficient. One minor observation: the implementation could benefit from a separate main stack for data storage (like the reference solution) to make the code's intent clearer, though the current approach is equally valid.
  • The comments mention "peek" but the method is called "top" - minor inconsistency but doesn't affect functionality.

Overall Assessment:
This is a solid implementation that correctly solves the problem with O(1) time complexity for all operations. The single-stack optimization is actually more space-efficient than the reference solution while maintaining the same time complexity.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants