Added Trigger.dark theme to the docs

[D-K-P]

---

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: dda2119

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This change introduces a CSS variables-based theming system to the documentation. The docs/docs.json file is updated with a new styling configuration that specifies the codeblocks theme as "css-variables". Correspondingly, docs/style.css is extended with a :root CSS block that defines theme-related variables including mint colors, token colors, and Shiki fallbacks for dark theme support.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description is missing all required sections from the template (Testing, Changelog, issue reference) and only contains a Devin badge.	Add required sections: issue reference, testing steps, and changelog description to complete the template.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding a dark theme configuration to the documentation styling.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f53db6f and dda2119.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/docs.json
• docs/style.css

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx,json,md,yaml,yml}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Format code using Prettier before committing

Files:

• docs/docs.json

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/style.css (1)

5-31: LGTM!

The CSS variables are well-organized with clear comments separating the Mintlify theme tokens from the Shiki fallbacks. The color values are consistent between both sets, ensuring uniform syntax highlighting appearance.

docs/docs.json (1)

442-446: LGTM!

The styling.codeblocks.theme configuration correctly enables CSS variable-based theming, which integrates well with the custom properties defined in style.css.

_{✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 2 additional flags.

[vibe-kanban-cloud]

Review Complete

Your review story is ready!

View Story

Comment !reviewfast on this PR to re-generate the story.