Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates project dependencies across multiple packages, modifies ESLint's caching strategy from metadata-based to content-based, reorganizes TypeScript type declarations between main and test configurations, and adds ignore patterns for TypeScript build artifacts. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates tooling/dependencies (likely for the 3.3.6 cycle), and refines TypeScript/ESLint configuration so test-only types and build artifacts are scoped/ignored more appropriately.
Changes:
- Move Vitest type definitions from the root
tsconfig.jsonintotests/tsconfig.json. - Adjust ESLint cache strategy in the programmatic lint step.
- Bump dev/tooling dependencies (Vitest, dependency-cruiser, eslint-plugin-jsdoc, @types/node) and update ignore patterns for TS build info.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tsconfig.json | Removes vitest from root types to avoid leaking test globals/types into non-test compilation. |
| tests/tsconfig.json | Adds types: ["node", "vitest"] to restore test typing under the tests project. |
| src/build/build-eslint.ts | Changes ESLint cache strategy for the CLI build lint step. |
| package.json | Updates tool/dev dependency versions (Vitest, dependency-cruiser, eslint-plugin-jsdoc, @types/node). |
| pnpm-lock.yaml | Lockfile updates reflecting dependency bumps. |
| .gitignore | Adds tsbuildinfo ignores and keeps ESLint cache ignore entry. |
Files not reviewed (1)
- pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)
23-24:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorInconsistent ESLint cache strategy between npm scripts and build code.
The lint scripts here use
--cache-strategy metadata, butsrc/build/build-eslint.ts(line 20) was changed to usecacheStrategy: "content". Consider aligning both to use the same strategy for consistent behavior.🔧 Suggested fix
- "lint": "eslint src --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx --cache --cache-location .cache/eslint/.eslintcache --cache-strategy metadata --fix", - "lint:ci": "eslint src --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx --cache --cache-location .cache/eslint/.eslintcache --cache-strategy metadata", + "lint": "eslint src --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx --cache --cache-location .cache/eslint/.eslintcache --cache-strategy content --fix", + "lint:ci": "eslint src --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx --cache --cache-location .cache/eslint/.eslintcache --cache-strategy content",🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 23 - 24, The ESLint cache strategy is inconsistent: package.json scripts "lint" and "lint:ci" use --cache-strategy metadata while the programmatic runner in build-eslint.ts sets cacheStrategy: "content"; update one side so both match. Choose the desired strategy (either "metadata" or "content") and apply it consistently by changing the package.json scripts' --cache-strategy flag to the same value as cacheStrategy in build-eslint.ts or vice versa (update cacheStrategy in build-eslint.ts to "metadata"), ensuring the scripts "lint" and "lint:ci" and the build-eslint.ts cacheStrategy setting all use the identical strategy string.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 23-24: The ESLint cache strategy is inconsistent: package.json
scripts "lint" and "lint:ci" use --cache-strategy metadata while the
programmatic runner in build-eslint.ts sets cacheStrategy: "content"; update one
side so both match. Choose the desired strategy (either "metadata" or "content")
and apply it consistently by changing the package.json scripts' --cache-strategy
flag to the same value as cacheStrategy in build-eslint.ts or vice versa (update
cacheStrategy in build-eslint.ts to "metadata"), ensuring the scripts "lint" and
"lint:ci" and the build-eslint.ts cacheStrategy setting all use the identical
strategy string.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1ed926dc-17ec-4a80-b81d-7be800ad6a13
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.gitignorepackage.jsonsrc/build/build-eslint.tstests/tsconfig.jsontsconfig.json
chore(deps): update pnpm/action-setup action to v4.3.0
Pull Request is not mergeable
Summary by CodeRabbit