Skip to content

feat(cli): add bulk cancel, --status filter, fix step JSON hydration#1467

Open
Ralph-20 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
lucas/dse-2320-cli-bulk-cancel
Open

feat(cli): add bulk cancel, --status filter, fix step JSON hydration#1467
Ralph-20 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
lucas/dse-2320-cli-bulk-cancel

Conversation

@Ralph-20
Copy link

@Ralph-20 Ralph-20 commented Mar 20, 2026

Description

Three changes to the CLI:

1. Bulk cancel (workflow cancel --status=<status>)

  • Cancel multiple runs matching --status and/or --workflowName filters
  • Shows a table of matching runs before cancelling
  • Interactive y/n confirmation prompt (bypass with -y/--confirm for CI)
  • Per-run progress output with success/failure tracking
  • --limit controls max runs per batch (default 50), warns if more match

2. Status filter for inspect runs (--status)

  • New --status flag on workflow inspect runs
  • Filters by: running, completed, failed, cancelled, pending
  • Passes through to existing ListWorkflowRunsParams.status in World API

3. Fix: step I/O hydration in JSON output

  • workflow inspect steps --withData --json now shows hydrated JS values
  • Previously showed raw devalue byte arrays ({"0":100,...})
  • Matches behavior already present in inspect runs --json

Why: Needed to manually cancel 40+ stuck runs one at a time. The World API already supports status filtering — the CLI just didn't expose it.


CLI Output Examples

Bulk cancel 3 running workflows:

$ workflow cancel --status=running -y

Found 3 runs to cancel:

runId                            workflow          status   startedAt
-------------------------------  ----------------  -------  ------------------------
wrun_01KM66FHPGHJYPWS7SEZZD55SX  sleepingWorkflow  running  2026-03-20T18:00:20.953Z
wrun_01KM66FHEPTETDK2M1TBB5QRA8  sleepingWorkflow  running  2026-03-20T18:00:20.706Z
wrun_01KM66FH7HF293ANJGKZMQ8CDE  sleepingWorkflow  running  2026-03-20T18:00:20.486Z

  ✓ wrun_01KM66FHPGHJYPWS7SEZZD55SX (1/3)
  ✓ wrun_01KM66FHEPTETDK2M1TBB5QRA8 (2/3)
  ✓ wrun_01KM66FH7HF293ANJGKZMQ8CDE (3/3)

Done: 3 cancelled

hasMore warning (more runs than --limit):

$ workflow cancel --status=running --limit=1 -y

Found 1 runs to cancel:

runId                            workflow          status   startedAt
-------------------------------  ----------------  -------  ------------------------
wrun_01KM66GTZJCWENQX2FR2GE4RKY  sleepingWorkflow  running  2026-03-20T18:01:03.236Z

[Warn] More runs match these filters. Increase --limit (currently 1) or re-run to cancel additional runs.
  ✓ wrun_01KM66GTZJCWENQX2FR2GE4RKY (1/1)

Done: 1 cancelled

No matching runs:

$ workflow cancel --status=running -y
[Warn] No matching runs found.

Error — no filters provided:

$ workflow cancel
[Error] Provide a run ID or use --status/--workflowName to bulk cancel.
Examples:
  workflow cancel <run-id>
  workflow cancel --status=running
  workflow cancel --status=running --workflowName=myWorkflow

--status filter on inspect runs:

$ workflow inspect runs --status=cancelled --limit 5

Status Legend:
  R = running  C = completed  F = failed  X = cancelled  P = pending

runId    workflowName      S  startedAt
-------  ----------------  -  -----------------------
...55SX  sleepingWorkflow  X  2026-03-20 18:00:20.953
...QRA8  sleepingWorkflow  X  2026-03-20 18:00:20.706
...8CDE  sleepingWorkflow  X  2026-03-20 18:00:20.486

Step hydration fix (--json shows actual values, not byte arrays):

{
    "stepName": "step//./workflows/98_duplicate_case//add",
    "status": "completed",
    "input": { "args": [205, 5] },
    "output": 210
}

Previously "output" would show {"0": 210} (raw devalue bytes).


How did you test your changes?

Reusable E2E test script (packages/cli/test-bulk-cancel.sh) against local world backend — 8/8 passing:

# Test Result
1 Single cancel regression
2 --status filter on inspect runs
3 Bulk cancel --status=running (3 workflows)
4 Bulk cancel --workflowName filter
5 No matching runs warning
6 Step JSON hydration (actual values, not byte arrays)
7 hasMore warning with --limit=1
8 Error when no runId or filters

Run with: cd packages/cli && pnpm build && bash test-bulk-cancel.sh (requires workbench on :3000)

Known limitations / follow-ups

  • --workflowName requires full WDK pathsleepingWorkflow won't match workflow//./workflows/99_e2e//sleepingWorkflow. The World API does exact match. Could add substring/suffix matching in a follow-up.
  • Interactive prompt not tested — only tested -y auto-confirm. The promptConfirm() function is standard readline, but no automated TTY test exists.
  • Only tested --backend local — Vercel backend uses different workflow name formats. Status filter should work identically since it passes through to the same World API.
  • Cancelling terminal-state runscancel --status=completed lists runs and attempts cancel, but each cancel fails with "Cannot transition from terminal state". Could filter these out upfront or add a pre-check.

PR Checklist - Required to merge

  • 📦 pnpm changeset was run to create a changelog for this PR
  • 🔒 DCO sign-off passes
  • 📝 Ping @vercel/workflow in a comment once the PR is ready

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Bulk cancel: `workflow cancel --status=running` cancels all matching runs
  with confirmation prompt (bypass with -y). Supports --workflowName and --limit.
- Status filter: `workflow inspect runs --status=completed` filters by status.
- Fix: `inspect steps --withData --json` now shows hydrated values, not raw bytes.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Ralph <lucas@vercel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Ralph <lucas.ralph@vercel.com>
@Ralph-20 Ralph-20 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2026 17:47
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 20, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 471fcce

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/cli Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/ai Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Mar 20, 2026

@Ralph-20
Copy link
Author

cc @vercel/workflow — ready for review when you get a chance

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.045s (~) 1.006s (~) 0.961s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.046s (-4.0%) 1.005s (~) 0.960s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.051s 1.006s 0.955s 10 1.13x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.055s 1.005s 0.950s 10 1.23x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.056s (-20.8% 🟢) 1.011s (-0.6%) 0.955s 10 1.25x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.058s 1.011s 0.953s 10 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.063s (-8.7% 🟢) 1.014s (~) 0.951s 10 1.41x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.100s 1.008s 0.908s 10 2.23x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 0.515s (+3.8%) 2.584s (+1.6%) 2.069s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.520s (-27.9% 🟢) 2.507s (-3.1%) 1.987s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.118s 2.006s 0.889s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.123s 2.006s 0.883s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.125s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.881s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.135s (+0.5%) 2.006s (~) 0.871s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.144s (~) 2.011s (~) 0.867s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.144s 2.012s 0.867s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.151s (+1.1%) 2.013s (~) 0.862s 10 1.03x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 1.316s 2.009s 0.692s 10 1.18x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.097s (-10.3% 🟢) 3.937s (+1.6%) 1.839s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.223s (-4.3%) 3.821s (~) 1.598s 10 1.06x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.748s 11.023s 0.275s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.800s 11.024s 0.224s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.905s (~) 11.044s (~) 0.139s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 10.911s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.112s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.935s (~) 11.043s (~) 0.108s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.937s 11.040s 0.103s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.963s (+0.5%) 11.024s (~) 0.061s 3 1.02x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 12.323s 13.023s 0.700s 3 1.15x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 17.498s (-1.5%) 20.058s (+1.3%) 2.559s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 18.061s (+3.8%) 20.113s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.052s 2 1.03x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 14.291s 15.030s 0.739s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.526s 15.044s 0.518s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.626s (-1.3%) 15.040s (~) 0.415s 4 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.634s 15.028s 0.394s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.671s (+0.7%) 15.039s (~) 0.368s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 14.921s (~) 15.029s (~) 0.107s 4 1.04x
💻 Local Express 15.070s (~) 16.032s (+3.2%) 0.962s 4 1.05x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 17.793s 18.024s 0.231s 4 1.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 33.117s (+2.4%) 34.682s (~) 1.565s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 33.695s (+3.8%) 35.300s (+1.8%) 1.605s 2 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 13.406s 14.025s 0.619s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.075s 14.752s 0.677s 7 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.091s (-1.9%) 14.752s (-1.9%) 0.661s 7 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.190s (+1.3%) 15.038s (+3.9%) 0.848s 6 1.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 16.279s 16.863s 0.584s 6 1.21x
💻 Local Nitro 16.439s (~) 17.030s (~) 0.591s 6 1.23x
💻 Local Express 16.638s (~) 17.032s (~) 0.394s 6 1.24x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 20.416s 21.030s 0.614s 5 1.52x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 54.495s (-3.1%) 56.401s (-1.5%) 1.906s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 66.410s (+5.8% 🔺) 67.915s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.505s 2 1.22x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.245s 2.011s 0.766s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.277s (+0.9%) 2.011s (~) 0.734s 15 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.281s (-0.9%) 2.011s (~) 0.730s 15 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.366s 2.073s 0.707s 15 1.10x
💻 Local Nitro 1.479s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.525s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.507s 2.005s 0.498s 15 1.21x
💻 Local Express 1.512s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.494s 15 1.21x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.194s 3.009s 0.815s 10 1.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.863s (+14.8% 🔺) 4.464s (+14.4% 🔺) 1.601s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.872s (+9.7% 🔺) 4.294s (+2.2%) 1.422s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.440s 3.011s 0.572s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.453s (-0.7%) 3.011s (~) 0.558s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.469s (~) 3.012s (~) 0.544s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.544s 3.008s 0.464s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.863s (~) 3.007s (-3.2%) 0.144s 10 1.17x
💻 Local Express 2.993s (~) 3.341s (-6.3% 🟢) 0.348s 9 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.997s 3.885s 0.888s 8 1.23x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.766s 5.178s 0.412s 6 1.95x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.654s (+4.6%) 4.067s (+6.8% 🔺) 1.413s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.224s (+22.6% 🔺) 4.795s (+19.1% 🔺) 1.571s 7 1.21x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.594s (~) 4.014s (~) 0.421s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.613s (-0.5%) 4.015s (~) 0.402s 8 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.771s 4.013s 0.241s 8 1.05x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.204s 4.868s 0.664s 7 1.17x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.428s 7.766s 0.339s 4 2.07x
💻 Local Nitro 8.350s (+2.8%) 8.769s (~) 0.419s 4 2.32x
💻 Local Express 8.454s (~) 9.020s (~) 0.566s 4 2.35x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 10.013s 10.685s 0.672s 3 2.79x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.518s (+15.6% 🔺) 4.975s (+11.3% 🔺) 1.456s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.914s (+16.7% 🔺) 5.503s (+9.8% 🔺) 1.589s 6 1.11x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.231s 2.010s 0.779s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.259s (-1.4%) 2.010s (~) 0.751s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.268s (+0.7%) 2.011s (~) 0.743s 15 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.295s 2.006s 0.711s 15 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.497s 2.005s 0.508s 15 1.22x
💻 Local Nitro 1.517s (-2.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.489s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Express 1.591s (+3.5%) 2.007s (~) 0.416s 15 1.29x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.192s 3.008s 0.815s 10 1.78x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.377s (-8.6% 🟢) 3.766s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.389s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.609s (+22.8% 🔺) 4.187s (+13.4% 🔺) 1.578s 8 1.10x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.432s 3.012s 0.580s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.453s (~) 3.013s (~) 0.560s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.465s (~) 3.012s (~) 0.546s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.603s 3.109s 0.505s 10 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.752s 3.308s 0.556s 10 1.13x
💻 Local Nitro 2.947s (-2.7%) 3.565s (-3.0%) 0.618s 9 1.21x
💻 Local Express 3.251s (+7.2% 🔺) 4.012s (+6.7% 🔺) 0.761s 8 1.34x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.727s 5.177s 0.449s 6 1.94x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.326s (-10.1% 🟢) 3.830s (-0.8%) 1.503s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.716s (+14.1% 🔺) 4.128s (+12.7% 🔺) 1.412s 8 1.17x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.558s (-1.6%) 4.015s (~) 0.457s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.585s (~) 4.016s (~) 0.431s 8 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.759s 4.015s 0.257s 8 1.06x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.133s 4.868s 0.735s 7 1.16x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.894s 8.516s 0.622s 4 2.22x
💻 Local Nitro 8.599s (-0.5%) 9.020s (~) 0.421s 4 2.42x
💻 Local Express 8.849s (-2.3%) 9.275s (-5.1% 🟢) 0.426s 4 2.49x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 10.027s 10.683s 0.657s 3 2.82x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.391s (+19.9% 🔺) 4.680s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.288s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.684s (-6.0% 🟢) 5.266s (-4.1%) 1.582s 6 1.09x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.686s 1.004s 0.318s 60 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.830s 1.004s 0.175s 60 1.21x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.831s 1.026s 0.194s 59 1.21x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.853s (-4.9%) 1.025s (-1.7%) 0.173s 59 1.24x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.869s (~) 1.026s (~) 0.157s 59 1.27x
💻 Local Nitro 0.973s (+1.8%) 1.057s (+3.5%) 0.084s 57 1.42x
💻 Local Express 1.038s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.941s (+77.2% 🔺) 0.903s 31 1.51x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.139s 3.008s 0.870s 20 3.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 10.090s (+5.7% 🔺) 12.006s (+9.7% 🔺) 1.915s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 10.687s (+1.8%) 13.377s (+8.5% 🔺) 2.691s 5 1.06x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.616s 2.006s 0.390s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.997s 2.285s 0.288s 40 1.24x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.061s (-4.6%) 2.799s (-6.0% 🟢) 0.738s 33 1.28x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.092s (-1.1%) 2.979s (-1.1%) 0.887s 31 1.29x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.626s 3.008s 0.382s 30 1.62x
💻 Local Nitro 2.979s (+0.8%) 3.341s (+7.4% 🔺) 0.362s 27 1.84x
💻 Local Express 3.100s (+2.9%) 3.966s (+11.8% 🔺) 0.866s 23 1.92x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 5.242s 6.011s 0.769s 15 3.24x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 37.409s (+20.6% 🔺) 39.228s (+20.8% 🔺) 1.819s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 41.403s (+26.8% 🔺) 43.415s (+27.1% 🔺) 2.012s 3 1.11x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.248s 4.009s 0.760s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.983s 4.300s 0.317s 28 1.23x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 4.176s (-3.7%) 5.013s (~) 0.838s 24 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.271s (~) 5.014s (+0.8%) 0.742s 24 1.31x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.512s 9.017s 0.505s 14 2.62x
💻 Local Nitro 9.000s (~) 9.555s (+0.8%) 0.556s 13 2.77x
💻 Local Express 9.059s (-1.0%) 9.712s (-0.8%) 0.653s 13 2.79x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 10.756s 11.109s 0.354s 11 3.31x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 89.182s (-3.4%) 90.493s (-4.0%) 1.311s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 92.522s (-5.0% 🟢) 94.315s (-5.1% 🟢) 1.794s 2 1.04x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.274s 1.009s 0.735s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.291s (-3.7%) 1.009s (~) 0.718s 60 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.294s (~) 1.009s (~) 0.714s 60 1.07x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.388s 1.004s 0.616s 60 1.42x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.560s 1.021s 0.461s 59 2.05x
💻 Local Express 0.590s (-2.2%) 1.022s (+1.7%) 0.432s 59 2.15x
💻 Local Nitro 0.685s (+14.5% 🔺) 1.076s (+7.2% 🔺) 0.392s 56 2.50x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 1.674s 2.150s 0.476s 28 6.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.932s (-16.7% 🟢) 3.624s (-6.3% 🟢) 1.692s 17 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.030s (+6.8% 🔺) 3.911s (+9.3% 🔺) 1.882s 16 1.05x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.529s (-1.8%) 1.009s (~) 0.480s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.538s (+2.0%) 1.010s (~) 0.471s 90 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.540s 1.009s 0.469s 90 1.02x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.185s 2.006s 0.821s 45 2.24x
💻 Local Express 2.410s (-6.6% 🟢) 3.009s (~) 0.599s 30 4.56x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.438s 3.008s 0.571s 30 4.61x
💻 Local Nitro 2.575s (+4.0%) 3.008s (~) 0.434s 30 4.87x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.737s 5.232s 0.495s 18 8.95x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.352s (+15.7% 🔺) 5.241s (+24.3% 🔺) 1.889s 18 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.669s (+6.7% 🔺) 5.341s (+11.1% 🔺) 1.673s 17 1.09x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.891s 1.094s 0.203s 110 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.907s (-3.3%) 1.068s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.161s 113 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.931s (+3.7%) 1.127s (+8.3% 🔺) 0.196s 107 1.05x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.729s 3.032s 0.304s 40 3.06x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 9.980s 10.516s 0.537s 12 11.21x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.456s 11.027s 0.572s 11 11.74x
💻 Local Express 10.689s (-5.3% 🟢) 11.119s (-7.6% 🟢) 0.430s 11 12.00x
💻 Local Nitro 11.138s (~) 11.848s (+1.6%) 0.709s 11 12.51x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 7.725s (-1.5%) 9.292s (-0.8%) 1.567s 13 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 7.878s (-5.8% 🟢) 9.605s (-1.5%) 1.726s 13 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.177s 1.000s 0.002s 1.007s 0.831s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.192s 1.002s 0.012s 1.018s 0.826s 10 1.09x
💻 Local Nitro 0.199s (+1.3%) 1.003s (~) 0.011s (-11.0% 🟢) 1.017s (~) 0.818s 10 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.199s 1.001s 0.002s 1.013s 0.813s 10 1.13x
💻 Local Express 0.210s (+2.9%) 1.003s (~) 0.010s (-13.4% 🟢) 1.016s (~) 0.806s 10 1.19x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.215s (-10.1% 🟢) 0.996s (~) 0.001s (-7.1% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.797s 10 1.22x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.218s (+0.8%) 0.994s (~) 0.002s (+33.3% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.794s 10 1.24x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.507s 0.946s 0.002s 1.009s 0.502s 10 2.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.585s (-4.1%) 2.389s (-10.9% 🟢) 0.006s (-6.7% 🟢) 3.036s (-7.3% 🟢) 1.451s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.634s (-5.5% 🟢) 2.803s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.008s (+26.2% 🔺) 3.382s (-5.9% 🟢) 1.748s 10 1.03x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.551s 1.001s 0.003s 1.013s 0.461s 60 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.651s 1.008s 0.010s 1.024s 0.373s 59 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.701s (-2.9%) 1.006s (~) 0.004s (+3.3%) 1.025s (~) 0.324s 59 1.27x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.712s (+2.6%) 1.004s (~) 0.004s (-4.9%) 1.026s (~) 0.314s 59 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.725s 1.009s 0.004s 1.026s 0.300s 59 1.32x
💻 Local Nitro 0.725s (~) 1.009s (~) 0.010s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.024s (~) 0.298s 59 1.32x
💻 Local Express 0.763s (-1.8%) 1.010s (-1.7%) 0.010s (+6.6% 🔺) 1.025s (-1.5%) 0.263s 59 1.38x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 1.320s 1.949s 0.003s 2.012s 0.692s 30 2.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.323s (~) 5.575s (+1.2%) 0.258s (-1.5%) 6.414s (+1.9%) 2.091s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.346s (+17.5% 🔺) 6.528s (+12.8% 🔺) 0.235s (+17.1% 🔺) 7.356s (+12.7% 🔺) 2.010s 9 1.24x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.795s 1.000s 0.000s 1.004s 0.209s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.908s (-1.4%) 1.126s (+5.9% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 1.158s (+7.1% 🔺) 0.249s 52 1.14x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.928s (+3.8%) 1.165s (+7.6% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 1.183s (+7.1% 🔺) 0.255s 52 1.17x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.929s 1.072s 0.000s 1.081s 0.152s 56 1.17x
💻 Local Express 1.234s (-1.9%) 2.020s (~) 0.000s (-35.3% 🟢) 2.023s (~) 0.789s 30 1.55x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.241s 2.018s 0.000s 2.022s 0.781s 30 1.56x
💻 Local Nitro 1.244s (+1.6%) 2.019s (~) 0.000s (~) 2.022s (~) 0.777s 30 1.56x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.343s 2.945s 0.000s 3.007s 0.664s 20 2.95x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.599s (+2.4%) 3.469s (+7.9% 🔺) 0.000s (+400.0% 🔺) 4.051s (+7.8% 🔺) 1.451s 16 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.323s (+13.4% 🔺) 4.142s (+3.9%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 4.837s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.514s 13 1.28x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.506s 2.001s 0.000s 2.006s 0.500s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.891s (+4.8%) 2.138s (+1.9%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.156s (+1.6%) 0.265s 28 1.26x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.893s 2.262s 0.000s 2.271s 0.378s 27 1.26x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.900s (~) 2.098s (-5.5% 🟢) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.138s (-4.6%) 0.239s 29 1.26x
💻 Local Express 3.374s (-2.0%) 4.031s (-1.6%) 0.001s (+12.5% 🔺) 4.035s (-1.6%) 0.661s 15 2.24x
💻 Local Nitro 3.605s (+8.3% 🔺) 4.232s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.001s (+70.7% 🔺) 4.236s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.631s 15 2.39x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 4.124s 4.647s 0.000s 4.653s 0.528s 13 2.74x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.391s 4.958s 0.000s 5.010s 0.619s 12 2.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.693s (+9.4% 🔺) 4.744s (+4.5%) 0.000s (~) 5.335s (+5.0%) 1.642s 12 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.664s (+6.8% 🔺) 5.514s (+2.2%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 6.145s (+3.1%) 1.480s 11 1.26x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 15/21
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 12/21
▲ Vercel Nitro 17/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🌐 Redis 11/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 15/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 758 0 67 825
✅ 💻 Local Development 782 0 118 900
✅ 📦 Local Production 782 0 118 900
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 782 0 118 900
✅ 🪟 Windows 72 0 3 75
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 118 56 15 189
✅ 📋 Other 198 0 27 225
Total 3492 56 466 4014

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (56 failed)

mongodb (3 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KM65W8E610FT6XHNSFFDWT40
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KM65WGD7YMA14ZRFBHA6XP31
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KM6621YY830N9KYNMAY1EF71

redis (2 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KM65W8E610FT6XHNSFFDWT40
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KM6621YY830N9KYNMAY1EF71

turso (51 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KM65V2KS5FBQ2859EXH3TGJC
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KM65V2KS5FBQ2859EXH3TGJC
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KM65VVE42C5J89XZZFDXTDJ0
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KM65V9E20ANM7FNPWFH0DNT2
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KM65VDYW0B287F5R3W06K6V6
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KM65VG8JXT6QYTDJFM01MW75
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KM65W8PAXVCGF71XT8S5JSVK
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KM65VX647Y79W81FCNBEEC5M
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KM65W8E610FT6XHNSFFDWT40
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KM65WGD7YMA14ZRFBHA6XP31
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KM65WPT6QX3NP3FWBMJSA1G7
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KM65X2MHP6YTDAQEJVXNXFMH
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KM65X6FBB6WKGDH0QKXM19MM
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KM65X8MM7WPGB1T2M3BQXP14
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KM65Y9KQP6Q4JKMPVTCEWVP2
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KM65YD34RDE7MTQ7QACJ16JR
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KM661D93QK6F3B195XF0EW12
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KM6621YY830N9KYNMAY1EF71
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KM662P4TNF2ERRHTYQM2GXDH
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KM6639ZBQDTCN7HKX3591PE3
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KM663JWSCD5WTA0KJF9PBNHJ
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KM663RH3ZSDHCFRF7VXGXTH9
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KM663TR40MSTA5QMVZV2FV9T
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KM664ANY8M3D4Q85J8QY1V55
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KM664GEW04KF6EWAKR8BDF86
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KM664P5BBE320Q3QVR4ZZBA6
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KM664VYZPRJ3WGGE8SYFX0E4
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KM66531DGADTADTVC2M409AJ
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KM6659S5ZNWDGDSYVQ6FQ1R5
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KM665GK94J2MSN4B5C46YPED
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KM665V1NVW703FHP8KJB06TH
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KM6663048NJEHJ6YVGCHD5ZY
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KM666B0RDJF28A22S4J9V4NT
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KM666MJ56VA1SM8F987TXEHQ
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KM66716AZEDD63R680KW6J18
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KM667PNS8DKRFPY9G0ZCT3AY
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KM6680GENCRVR9S9D92RT8JA

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 68 0 7
✅ example 68 0 7
✅ express 68 0 7
✅ fastify 68 0 7
✅ hono 68 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 73 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 73 0 2
✅ nitro 68 0 7
✅ nuxt 68 0 7
✅ sveltekit 68 0 7
✅ vite 68 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 66 0 9
✅ express-stable 66 0 9
✅ fastify-stable 66 0 9
✅ hono-stable 66 0 9
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 66 0 9
✅ nuxt-stable 66 0 9
✅ sveltekit-stable 66 0 9
✅ vite-stable 66 0 9
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 66 0 9
✅ express-stable 66 0 9
✅ fastify-stable 66 0 9
✅ hono-stable 66 0 9
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 66 0 9
✅ nuxt-stable 66 0 9
✅ sveltekit-stable 66 0 9
✅ vite-stable 66 0 9
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 66 0 9
✅ express-stable 66 0 9
✅ fastify-stable 66 0 9
✅ hono-stable 66 0 9
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 55 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 72 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 66 0 9
✅ nuxt-stable 66 0 9
✅ sveltekit-stable 66 0 9
✅ vite-stable 66 0 9
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 72 0 3
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 3 0 2
❌ mongodb 52 3 3
✅ redis-dev 3 0 2
❌ redis 53 2 3
✅ turso-dev 3 0 2
❌ turso 4 51 3
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 66 0 9
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 66 0 9
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 66 0 9

📋 View full workflow run

Copy link
Member

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sweet, thanks!

Comment on lines +173 to +175
// Non-TTY: skip confirmation
if (!process.stdin.isTTY) {
return true;
Copy link
Contributor

@vercel vercel bot Mar 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bulk cancel silently auto-confirms in non-interactive environments (CI, pipes, cron) without requiring the -y flag, risking accidental mass cancellation of workflow runs.

Fix on Vercel

Copy link
Member

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious Mar 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ralph-20 I assumed this was intentional and am fine with it, but let me know if not. Once confirmed, I'll merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants