Skip to content

rwlock instead of mutex around encoding ids #6720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
danking wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
+9 −9

rwlock instead of mutex around encoding ids

e5dafff
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Draft

rwlock instead of mutex around encoding ids #6720

rwlock instead of mutex around encoding ids
e5dafff
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis succeeded Feb 28, 2026 in 0s

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 952 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1466 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] 501.1 ns 442.8 ns +13.17%
⚡ Simulation map_each[BufferMut<i32>, 128] 858.1 ns 770.6 ns +11.36%

Comparing dk/rwlock-session (e5dafff) with develop (e0ce169)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1466 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ