Updated Variant array and the new VariantGet expression #7877
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
May 15, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 10 improved benchmarks
✅ 1206 untouched benchmarks
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 2)] |
168.9 µs | 148.9 µs | +13.47% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 32)] |
175.7 µs | 155.4 µs | +13.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 4)] |
169.5 µs | 149.3 µs | +13.5% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 8)] |
170.4 µs | 149.9 µs | +13.63% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384] |
109.7 µs | 95.4 µs | +15% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768] |
170.6 µs | 141.7 µs | +20.35% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768] |
135 µs | 121 µs | +11.52% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] |
145.2 µs | 115.9 µs | +25.26% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] |
237.5 µs | 178.8 µs | +32.82% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384] |
149.4 µs | 127.7 µs | +17.01% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/yet-another-variant-array (9b8a508) with develop (e3cc14f)
Loading