Add validity fast-path helper for the four pattern-matching encoders #7995
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
May 18, 2026 in 0s
Performance Regression: -0.44%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1215 untouched benchmarks
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)] |
273.3 µs | 309 µs | -11.56% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
197.9 µs | 161.9 µs | +22.25% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)] |
358.4 µs | 325 µs | +10.26% |
| ❌ | Simulation | new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 16384] |
103.9 µs | 118.3 µs | -12.18% |
| ❌ | Simulation | new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768] |
153.3 µs | 182.1 µs | -15.82% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | iter_arrow_buffer[128] |
919.4 ns | 831.9 ns | +10.52% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing claude/row-c10-validity-fast-path (7de4dcc) with develop (faf7e42)1
Footnotes
Loading