quality-playbook v1.2.0: state machine analysis and missing safeguard detection#1238
Merged
aaronpowell merged 1 commit intogithub:stagedfrom Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Conversation
… detection Add Step 5a (state machine completeness analysis) and expand Step 6 with missing safeguard detection patterns. These catch two categories of bugs that defensive pattern analysis alone misses: unhandled states in lifecycle/status machines, and operations that commit users to expensive work without adequate preview or termination conditions.
Contributor
🔍 Skill Validator Results2 resource(s) checked | ✅ All checks passed Full output |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the quality-playbook skill to v1.2.0 by adding explicit guidance for state machine completeness analysis and extending risk analysis to include “missing safeguard” detection, improving the playbook’s ability to surface unhandled lifecycle states and costly/irreversible operations without adequate user guardrails.
Changes:
- Bumped
quality-playbookmetadata/version banner to v1.2.0 and updated its description to mention the new analyses. - Added Step 5a: Trace State Machines to the core exploration workflow.
- Extended defensive pattern reference material with state machine and missing safeguard patterns; updated the skills index entry accordingly.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| skills/quality-playbook/SKILL.md | Version bump + adds Step 5a state machine tracing and expands Step 6 prompts for missing safeguard detection. |
| skills/quality-playbook/references/defensive_patterns.md | Adds reference sections for state machine patterns and missing safeguard patterns, plus updates the “Minimum Bar”. |
| docs/README.skills.md | Updates the skill catalog entry to reflect the expanded capability wording. |
aaronpowell
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add Step 5a (state machine completeness analysis) and expand Step 6 with missing safeguard detection patterns. These catch two categories of bugs that defensive pattern analysis alone misses: unhandled states in lifecycle/status machines, and operations that commit users to expensive work without adequate preview or termination conditions.
Validated against 5 codebases — all known bugs surfaced. README regenerated via
npm run build.